Will this hurt #metoo

saw this story this morning on every website on the planet basically, https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5b7a1c4de4b018b93e9524a5/amp

guess my question is will this really hurt the #metoo movement. Obviously some folks will crow, but at this point I don’t think this will be more than a speed bump. He was 17 so just below the age of consent which maybe she didn’t know was 18 in Cali, which doesn’t excuse it and she looks to have used her authority and age over him (looks almost like learned behavior from what Weinstein did to her). But I do have to wonder about the kid’s motivations and plenty of guys will say, “dude, it’s an older woman...what’s your deal?” 

My guess is she she will be kinda banished from the movement in any meaningful capacity but it won’t cause any huge backlash. Thoughts?
nstinson
«134

Comments

  • amyja89amyja89 Oxford, England
    I don't think it hurts the movement, it hurts her individually, and she isn't the movement. I don't see what her having an inappropriate encounter with a boy has to do with the multitude of unrelated good that #metoo is doing and the light that it is shining on an industry that has been allowed to dwell in the dark for so long.

    It's super unfortunate and disappointing hypocrisy, but from the other side of the coin, the guy involved is telling his own #metoo story, which might be a weight off his shoulders and encouragement for other males to involve themselves in the wider narrative too. I'm not naive enough to think that there aren't predatory females in the industry too.
    Travis
  • DeeDee Adelaide
    Of course it will hurt the movement. She should be bloody ashamed of herself. We all know exactly the kind of people who will latch onto this as a gotcha. 

    Age of consent is irrelevant. He states in the documents she sexually assaulted him. It doesn’t matter if he was 17 or 37. 
    Flukes
  • Dee said:
    Of course it will hurt the movement. She should be bloody ashamed of herself. We all know exactly the kind of people who will latch onto this as a gotcha. 

    Age of consent is irrelevant. He states in the documents she sexually assaulted him. It doesn’t matter if he was 17 or 37. 
    Was interested to see what you thought @Dee. Agree with you that it shouldn't matter if he was 17 and the part that kinda weirds me out is that they call each other "mother" and "son" since that is what they were in the movie they did together. Kinda creepy.

    For what it's worth, I hope this won't derail the movement and that @amyja89 is right that it will help more guys to feel comfortable in coming forward. I was just so surprised to see this come from one of the women who has been such a big voice. Do you think what Weinstein did to her made her think this was acceptable behavior?
  • JaimieTJaimieT Atlanta, GA
    edited August 2018
    anubus21 said:
    Dee said:
    Of course it will hurt the movement. She should be bloody ashamed of herself. We all know exactly the kind of people who will latch onto this as a gotcha. 

    Age of consent is irrelevant. He states in the documents she sexually assaulted him. It doesn’t matter if he was 17 or 37. 
    Was interested to see what you thought @Dee. Agree with you that it shouldn't matter if he was 17 and the part that kinda weirds me out is that they call each other "mother" and "son" since that is what they were in the movie they did together. Kinda creepy.

    For what it's worth, I hope this won't derail the movement and that @amyja89 is right that it will help more guys to feel comfortable in coming forward. I was just so surprised to see this come from one of the women who has been such a big voice. Do you think what Weinstein did to her made her think this was acceptable behavior?

    There's some psychological basis for cases where the victim becomes the abuser, but (1) it's never so basic as the victim thinking the behavior is acceptable and (2) it's impossible to diagnose that kind of thing from the outside. Also one must be cautious from thinking this sort of thing happens with all or even most or even many victims. 

    Women aren't immune to handling their power as poorly and thoughtlessly as men do.

    "Kinda creepy."

    That's just a garden variety kink. That's not to say it wasn't creepy in this context. I just can't tell what you mean.
    Flukes
  • JaimieT said:
    anubus21 said:
    Dee said:
    Of course it will hurt the movement. She should be bloody ashamed of herself. We all know exactly the kind of people who will latch onto this as a gotcha. 

    Age of consent is irrelevant. He states in the documents she sexually assaulted him. It doesn’t matter if he was 17 or 37. 
    Was interested to see what you thought @Dee. Agree with you that it shouldn't matter if he was 17 and the part that kinda weirds me out is that they call each other "mother" and "son" since that is what they were in the movie they did together. Kinda creepy.

    For what it's worth, I hope this won't derail the movement and that @amyja89 is right that it will help more guys to feel comfortable in coming forward. I was just so surprised to see this come from one of the women who has been such a big voice. Do you think what Weinstein did to her made her think this was acceptable behavior?

    There's some psychological basis for cases where the victim becomes the abuser, but (1) it's never so basic as the victim thinking the behavior is acceptable and (2) it's impossible to diagnose that kind of thing from the outside. Also one must be cautious from thinking this sort of thing happens with all or even most or even many victims. 

    Women aren't immune to handling their power as poorly and thoughtlessly as men do.

    "Kinda creepy."

    That's just a garden variety kink. That's not to say it wasn't creepy in this context. I just can't tell what you mean.
    Kinda creepy is just my way of saying creepy. I know it's normal kink, but never been my thing. And I don't think this happens with every victim. Once the metoo movement really got going and started to get more support she had to know this would come back to haunt her, or maybe she didn't and thought everything was cool with this guy. Guess we will find out more if he ever speaks out publicly.
  • doesn't help but it also doesn't really change the central message that the powerful take advantage of the less powerful for sexual gratification and that the less powerful should be given the benefit of the doubt.  the patriarchy on average benefits men and disadvantages women so the men will on average have more power and thus be more able to take advantage but that doesn't mean that every single interpersonal relationship follows that dynamic.
  • It shouldn't, but it will be used as some. I think most people are smart enough to know one example doesn't mean the movement is misplaced.
  • A_Ron_HubbardA_Ron_Hubbard Cincinnati, OH
    edited August 2018
    #metoo is as much about male victims as female. Look at the shameful way Hollywood is handling Terry Crews.  There is a thought that says women don't sexually harass and assault men at the same rate that men sexually harass and assault women, which I personally think is true, but I also think that female to male sexual harassment and assault is as least as unreported as the opposite, maybe more so. To say nothing of male to male sexual harassment. 

    I've been sexually harassed and assaulted by both genders over the course of my lifetime, and I have not reported any of the them. Mostly at the time, I didn't even consider them as harassment and assault because I didn't feel physically threatened in either occasion, and dismissed it as "she was drunk" or "was just fooling around", and I could have physically forced them to stop any time I wanted, so, maybe I was doing something to lead them on or encourage them? I know many men who would just laugh at me if I confided that it was embarrassing or humiliating or damaged my professional reputation, etc. 

    Regardless of how much of a problem it is in context of the female side of #metoo, it's not hard to see how badly sexism hurts everyone, which is why I firmly believe all men should be feminists as well. http://reddit.com/r/menslib is a great resource for the masculine side of the struggle towards equality.
    MichellegguenotNoelAlkaid13FlukesTravisNatter CastweeniegirlKingKobra_GAN_and 2 others.
  • FlukesFlukes Calgary, Canada
    Another example of the rampant abuse of power by the people who have it to get away with assaulting people who don't have it. This is more evidence of the necessity of #metoo.
    DeeCretanBull
  • I tried to find the source for the sexual assault claim but those documents aren't public, are they? All I see is this snippet from the NYT article:

    "Mr. Bennett’s notice of intent asked for $3.5 million in damages for the intentional infliction of emotional distress, lost wages, assault and battery. Mr. Bennett made more than $2.7 million in the five years before the 2013 meeting with Ms. Argento, but his income has since dropped to an average of $60,000 a year, which he attributes to the trauma that followed the sexual encounter with Ms. Argento, his lawyer wrote."
  • DeeDee Adelaide
    JaimieT said:
    anubus21 said:
    Dee said:
    Of course it will hurt the movement. She should be bloody ashamed of herself. We all know exactly the kind of people who will latch onto this as a gotcha. 

    Age of consent is irrelevant. He states in the documents she sexually assaulted him. It doesn’t matter if he was 17 or 37. 
    Was interested to see what you thought @Dee. Agree with you that it shouldn't matter if he was 17 and the part that kinda weirds me out is that they call each other "mother" and "son" since that is what they were in the movie they did together. Kinda creepy.

    For what it's worth, I hope this won't derail the movement and that @amyja89 is right that it will help more guys to feel comfortable in coming forward. I was just so surprised to see this come from one of the women who has been such a big voice. Do you think what Weinstein did to her made her think this was acceptable behavior?

    There's some psychological basis for cases where the victim becomes the abuser, but (1) it's never so basic as the victim thinking the behavior is acceptable and (2) it's impossible to diagnose that kind of thing from the outside. Also one must be cautious from thinking this sort of thing happens with all or even most or even many victims. 

    Women aren't immune to handling their power as poorly and thoughtlessly as men do.

    "Kinda creepy."

    That's just a garden variety kink. That's not to say it wasn't creepy in this context. I just can't tell what you mean.
    I think it goes a bit beyond a garden variety kink considering she met him when he was 7 and he played her son in a movie.
  • DeeDee Adelaide
    anubus21 said:
    Dee said:
    Of course it will hurt the movement. She should be bloody ashamed of herself. We all know exactly the kind of people who will latch onto this as a gotcha. 

    Age of consent is irrelevant. He states in the documents she sexually assaulted him. It doesn’t matter if he was 17 or 37. 
    Was interested to see what you thought @Dee. Agree with you that it shouldn't matter if he was 17 and the part that kinda weirds me out is that they call each other "mother" and "son" since that is what they were in the movie they did together. Kinda creepy.

    For what it's worth, I hope this won't derail the movement and that @amyja89 is right that it will help more guys to feel comfortable in coming forward. I was just so surprised to see this come from one of the women who has been such a big voice. Do you think what Weinstein did to her made her think this was acceptable behavior?
    I don’t know. Wasn’t she an adult when Weinstein raped her? If she was a child, I could believe she might have confused ideas about consent. Maybe there was something else going on in her childhood that made her grow up thinking this was okay. Or maybe she’s just yet another Hollywood predator. Who knows. 
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • Dee said:
    anubus21 said:
    Dee said:
    Of course it will hurt the movement. She should be bloody ashamed of herself. We all know exactly the kind of people who will latch onto this as a gotcha. 

    Age of consent is irrelevant. He states in the documents she sexually assaulted him. It doesn’t matter if he was 17 or 37. 
    Was interested to see what you thought @Dee. Agree with you that it shouldn't matter if he was 17 and the part that kinda weirds me out is that they call each other "mother" and "son" since that is what they were in the movie they did together. Kinda creepy.

    For what it's worth, I hope this won't derail the movement and that @amyja89 is right that it will help more guys to feel comfortable in coming forward. I was just so surprised to see this come from one of the women who has been such a big voice. Do you think what Weinstein did to her made her think this was acceptable behavior?
    I don’t know. Wasn’t she an adult when Weinstein raped her? If she was a child, I could believe she might have confused ideas about consent. Maybe there was something else going on in her childhood that made her grow up thinking this was okay. Or maybe she’s just yet another Hollywood predator. Who knows. 
    Think she was 18 or 19 when Weinstein assaulted her. 
    Dee
  • MattyWeavesMattyWeaves Mid-State New York
    Shitty people calling out shitty people doesn't negate the shitty things they did.

    So she's shitty too? That doesn't make what happened to her any less shitty or less valid.
    JaimieTOldGriswold
  • DeeDee Adelaide
    Shitty people calling out shitty people doesn't negate the shitty things they did.

    So she's shitty too? That doesn't make what happened to her any less shitty or less valid.
    I agree, but it is more disappointing and infuriating than just some random who was “Hell yeah #metoo!”-ing. Argento is front and centre of the movement, and one of Weinstein’s more well known accusers. She has deliberately placed herself as a primary voice of the movement, and it takes some gall considering what she was apparently hiding. This is a huge blow to an important movement. It makes it so much more difficult for other victims being believed. 
    Frakkin TMurderbeargguenotMattyWeavesphoenyx1023
  • amyja89amyja89 Oxford, England
    To full on deny any encounter when there is supposed photo evidence floating around is WILD.
    Dee
  • amyja89 said:
    To full on deny any encounter when there is supposed photo evidence floating around is WILD.
    She also partially laid it at the feet of Bourdain and saying he told her to just pay the kid. 
  • This whole thing is horrible.

    Either she preyed on a barely-seventeen year old that she had known in a mentor role, a position of power/authority, for like a decade and is now denying that anything happened and further blaming her dead boyfriend for the idea of paying the accuser off; or a failed child actor desperate for money extorted the sympathy of Bourdain and Argento for some quick cash based on a picture that could either be viewed as innocent or damning depending on the circumstances around it.

    Either way, it’s ugly, and I tend to believe the accuser until/unless more info comes to light. I can’t find any details on the alleged picture other than it showed them laying in a hotel bed. I assume they were fully clothed and taking a selfie in such a way isn’t necessarily weird, but it isn’t necessarily innocent either. If they were in some suggestive state of undress, then it would be hard to believe to be innocent.
  • JaimieTJaimieT Atlanta, GA
    Well we're supposed to believe women, right?

    ....

    I didn't think this was a big deal until now, her denial. 
  • edited August 2018
    LordBy said:
    This whole thing is horrible.

    Either she preyed on a barely-seventeen year old that she had known in a mentor role, a position of power/authority, for like a decade and is now denying that anything happened and further blaming her dead boyfriend for the idea of paying the accuser off; or a failed child actor desperate for money extorted the sympathy of Bourdain and Argento for some quick cash based on a picture that could either be viewed as innocent or damning depending on the circumstances around it.

    Either way, it’s ugly, and I tend to believe the accuser until/unless more info comes to light. I can’t find any details on the alleged picture other than it showed them laying in a hotel bed. I assume they were fully clothed and taking a selfie in such a way isn’t necessarily weird, but it isn’t necessarily innocent either. If they were in some suggestive state of undress, then it would be hard to believe to be innocent.
    According to the anonymous source who broke the story, the picture was turned over to Argento and she got all copyrights to it. I don't think it will ever come out because then the kid would probably be in violation of the settlement if it turns out he sent it to anyone. If that is true it makes her denial sound fishy.
  • MattyWeavesMattyWeaves Mid-State New York
    Dee said:
    Shitty people calling out shitty people doesn't negate the shitty things they did.

    So she's shitty too? That doesn't make what happened to her any less shitty or less valid.
    I agree, but it is more disappointing and infuriating than just some random who was “Hell yeah #metoo!”-ing. Argento is front and centre of the movement, and one of Weinstein’s more well known accusers. She has deliberately placed herself as a primary voice of the movement, and it takes some gall considering what she was apparently hiding. This is a huge blow to an important movement. It makes it so much more difficult for other victims being believed. 


    I wanted to respond earlier but I wasn't sure of the words. I guess it comes down to social issues (or something else?) in general of how people want to frame their own view of the world.

    If you (no you you, people in general) choose not to believe something someone tells you because they did something equally bad, then where does it end?

    Maybe this isn't the right subject for that idea, but the movement itself shouldn't have a setback because of one person. To me, and what I'd like to believe, most sane people, she moves aside and we keep listening to people and what they have to say.

    Even as I typed this, my brain started picking it apart because I know how many assholes are out there who don't care about common sense.
    A_Ron_HubbardDeephoenyx1023
  • LordByLordBy Utah
    edited August 2018
    Agree none of this has anything to do with the criminal sexual predator that is Harvey Weinstein. His behavior has been consistently exposed by many folks describing actions over many years. If he feels vindicated calling Argento a hypocrite, then that’s just another indictment of his narcissism. The movement itself will continue.
  • A_Ron_HubbardA_Ron_Hubbard Cincinnati, OH
    Dee said:
    Shitty people calling out shitty people doesn't negate the shitty things they did.

    So she's shitty too? That doesn't make what happened to her any less shitty or less valid.
    I agree, but it is more disappointing and infuriating than just some random who was “Hell yeah #metoo!”-ing. Argento is front and centre of the movement, and one of Weinstein’s more well known accusers. She has deliberately placed herself as a primary voice of the movement, and it takes some gall considering what she was apparently hiding. This is a huge blow to an important movement. It makes it so much more difficult for other victims being believed. 


    I wanted to respond earlier but I wasn't sure of the words. I guess it comes down to social issues (or something else?) in general of how people want to frame their own view of the world.

    If you (no you you, people in general) choose not to believe something someone tells you because they did something equally bad, then where does it end?

    Maybe this isn't the right subject for that idea, but the movement itself shouldn't have a setback because of one person. To me, and what I'd like to believe, most sane people, she moves aside and we keep listening to people and what they have to say.

    Even as I typed this, my brain started picking it apart because I know how many assholes are out there who don't care about common sense.
    I agree with this. It's the problem with whataboutism in general. If having a perfect cause and perfect victims is required to get people to give a shit, then no one will ever give a shit about anything, because no cause is perfect nor are people.

    There has to be some sort of preponderance of evidence thing going on. Like, hearing the bulk details, we arrive at a picture that says people in positions of power tend to abuse that power to gratify themselves.

    To the extent that more men are in positions of power than women, men will be over represented in the abuses. To the extent that they choose to gratify themselves sexually, the abuse will manifest in sexual harrassment and assault.

    That doesn't mean we should be surprised that women in positions of power also abuse that power to gratify themselves. That thought that women are angelic beings who are above sex and violence and the world would be a maigesrly better place of women were in all of the positions of power to the exclustion of men, which I sometimes here well meaning people articulate, is a fundentally sexist way to view the world.

    All victims deserve the right to be heard, and their claims taken seriously. That is a whataboutism proof stance, isn't it?
  • DeeDee Adelaide
    edited August 2018
    I’m not sure people are getting what I am saying. I don’t think it SHOULD hurt the movement, I’m saying it probably WILL, because there are enough dickheads out there who look for any reason to dismiss anything that is largely about women standing up for themselves (and yes, I know there are male victims too, but most of those who have spoken up and gotten involved so far are women). I’m also not saying that her assaulting this boy negates what Weinstein did to her. I’m saying what Weinstein did to her doesn’t make her assault of this boy any less horrible. 
    MattyWeavesCretanBull
  • A_Ron_HubbardA_Ron_Hubbard Cincinnati, OH
    Yeah, I guess what I'm saying Dee is it only hurts the movement if we collectively allow it too. You know? I feel like people are starting to wise up to some of this verbal camouflaging that's been going around allowing us to be side tracked and misdirected. Which hopefully means that will happen less.
    MattyWeavesDeeCretanBull
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • DeeDee Adelaide
    Well, again, the issue is not that he was underage. He wasn’t. The issue is that he has accused her of sexually assaulting him. 
This discussion has been closed.